Challenge

Assessing the Role of Defensive Registrations in TLD Reputation

To evaluate TLD reputation, the researchers needed to determine whether defensive registrations could explain the high share of low-content domains and resulting non-benign classifications observed in newer TLDs.

However, defensive registrations are not directly visible in DNS or passive data. Estimating their presence requires registrar-level context that can be applied consistently across large domain datasets.

Without this, it would be difficult to assess whether differences in TLD reputation were influenced by legitimate brand-protection activity or other factors.

Solution

Estimating Defensive Registrations with Registrar Data

To address this, the researchers incorporated WhoisXML API’s WHOIS API into their workflow.

Their methodology included:

  • collecting large-scale domain datasets from DNS and other sources

  • retrieving registrar information for domains using WHOIS API

  • mapping domains to a curated list of registrars commonly used for defensive registrations (based on prior research), as a proxy for estimating defensive activity

This approach allowed them to estimate the share of domains likely associated with defensive registration activity and incorporate that context into their analysis.

Results

Validating TLD Reputation Trends with Registrar Context

By leveraging WhoisXML API’s WHOIS data, the researchers were able to better interpret domain activity patterns across TLDs.

Estimation of defensive registration activity

Registrar data enabled the researchers to estimate the share of domains associated with registrars commonly used for defensive registrations and measure their presence across TLDs.

Limited impact of defensive registrations

Registrar data analysis showed that domains associated with defensive registrars made up only a small fraction of newer TLDs. This helped confirm that elevated non-benign or low-content domain shares were not primarily driven by defensive registrations.